This week in
lecture we began covering material on protozoan parasites, which can cause a
variety of diseases and can be harder to detect in the laboratory than other
organisms such as bacteria. In an
attempt to take a slightly different angle on the subject, I thought that going
over how some species can be monitored/detected in the environment would be
beneficial.
For the past
seven years prior to entering the program, I worked as a biologist for an
environmental testing laboratory, which participated in the EPA source water
monitoring study of systems for Giardia and
Cryptosporidium. During my time there
I analyzed over 3,000 samples, so you could say that I somewhat familiar with
the process.
The method
is long, labor intensive, time consuming and could take up to a week to
complete. In general, a large sample of
water is concentrated to just a few drops on a slide which is then stained and
examined microscopically.
First, a
roughly 10 liter sample of source water (which is the lake, river, etc that a
water processing plant pulls from to make drinking water) is collected and
filtered through a specialized filter that has pores small enough to catch the
desired organisms. Next, a soapy solution
is added to the filter, which is then shaken to remove and resuspend any
collected material. This solution is
then centrifuged to concentrate the dirt and any organisms into a pack
pellet. Then the supernatant is removed,
the pellet is resuspended, and transferred to a small tube. Next, a solution containing small iron beads
coated in anti-Crypto and anti-Giardia antibodies as well as pH buffers
are added to the tube with the sample.
The beads will grab onto the organisms, and in the presence of a magnet,
allow the potential organisms to be separated from the remainder of the
contents of the sample. This process
can then be reversed by the addition of acid, which elutes the organisms from
the beads into the eluate and onto a microscope slide. This can then be stained with fluorescent
dyes and examined for the presence and enumeration of the cysts and oocysts
which may be present.
For the EPA
study, water systems were required to send these samples in once a month for
two years. After the required monitoring
was completed, the data could be compiled to calculate the number of
cysts/oocysts per liter which could be correlated to a risk for these organisms
to contaminate the drinking water produced by the individual water system.
Hopefully
this was not too boring, but I thought that it would be useful for others to
know how these organisms are detected from environmental samples in addition to
their detection in human samples.
good information.
ReplyDelete